Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced prediction of circular RNA and microRNA interactions, suggesting new insights into gene regulation.
The complex regulatory network of circular RNA (circRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) interactions (CMI) plays a pivotal role in gene expression and disease pathogenesis. While computational models have emerged as efficient alternatives to labor-intensive wet-lab experiments, existing methods often rely on static sequence encodings and struggle to capture the high-order collaborative dependencies inherent in CMI networks. In this study, we propose RiGAT-CMI, a novel deep learning framework that integrates the large-scale pre-trained RNA language model, RiNALMo, with Graph Attention Networks (GAT) for accurate CMI prediction. By leveraging the contextual embeddings from RiNALMo-giga, our model captures intricate biological features beyond simple sequence motifs. These representations are then processed through a multi-layer GAT architecture with residual connections, explicitly mining high-order relational signals in the bipartite interaction graph. Comprehensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that RiGAT-CMI achieves state-of-the-art performance. On the large-scale CMI-20208 dataset, our model yielded an impressive AUC of 0.9583, an AUPR of 0.9458, and an MCC of 0.8153 on an independent test set. Comparative analysis reveals that the RiNALMo-giga scale significantly outperforms smaller variants, providing more robust features for downstream graph learning. Furthermore, ablation studies investigating the number of GAT layers and alternative architectures, such as the Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN), highlight the stability and generalization capability of our proposed 3-layer GAT configuration in mitigating overfitting. Our findings suggest that RiGAT-CMI is a powerful tool for discovering novel circRNA-miRNA associations, offering valuable insights into intracellular regulatory mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thanh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: