Identifies small-molecule inhibitors of OTU protease in CCHFV, suggesting new therapeutic options.
Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) remains a major public health threat due to its high mortality rates and the absence of approved antiviral therapies. The viral ovarian tumor (OTU) protease is a critical virulence factor that suppresses host innate immunity through its deubiquitinase activity, making it an attractive therapeutic target. In this study, we employed a structure-guided approach to identify and validate novel small-molecule inhibitors targeting the non-catalytic Y89-W99 pocket of the OTU protease. Recombinant OTU protease was successfully expressed, purified, and refolded, yielding a soluble and enzymatically active protein. Cellular assays confirmed that the enzyme retains robust deubiquitinase activity, significantly reducing global ubiquitin conjugates in mammalian cells. In silico analysis of a putative DUB inhibitor library identified several candidate inhibitors with favorable binding interactions within the Y89-W99 pocket. Biochemical validation using a fluorometric Ub-AMC assay revealed that multiple small molecules strongly inhibit OTU activity, including OTUi-10 (~93% inhibition), OTUi-13 (~87%), OTUi-1 (~85%), OTUi-4 and OTUi-11 (~81%), and OTUi-9 (~76%). Additional moderate inhibitors included OTUi-12 (~67%), OTUi-19 and OTUi-21 (~66%), and OTUi-5 (~57%). In silico drug-likeness and toxicity profiling filtered the library to four fully compliant candidates, OTUi-4, OTUi-10, OTUi-11, and OTUi-12, all free of predicted toxicity alerts. These findings suggest that the Y89–W99 pocket may be a pharmacologically relevant site worthy of further investigation and identify OTUi-10, OTUi-4, and OTUi-11 as promising preliminary hit compounds. The results also provide initial insights that may guide future optimization and mechanistic studies of OTU protease inhibitors targeting CCHFV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akgöl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: