Evaluates environmental performance of geopolymer breakwaters made from e-waste and C&D waste, suggesting their safety.
This study presents the evaluation of the environmental performance of a geopolymer based breakwater using a novel dual-waste valorisation approach that combines electronic waste (e-waste) derived sodium silicate from cathode ray tube glass (CRT) as a geopolymer activator, and construction and demolition waste (C&DW) aggregates. It will systematically investigate the leaching of major (Ca, Si, Al, Mg, Na) and trace/heavy metals (Cr, As, Zn, Fe, Pb, Ni, Cd, Cu) under simulated marine exposure. Geopolymer blocks incorporating e-waste derived sodium silicate and C&DW aggregates were compared with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete and commercial silicate-based geopolymers. Standard dynamic surface leaching tests were performed in deionized water (DIW) and seawater (SW) for 64 days, with extrapolated predictions for a 50-year service life. Cumulative release of major ions during 64-day immersion ranged from 3.5 to 700 gm −2 , while trace/heavy metals remained within 30–150 mgm −2 . Extrapolation over 50 years indicated that all trace/heavy metals, including Pb, Cd, Ni, Cu, Mn, As, Cr, Zn, and Fe, would remain below 1 gm −2 , while abundant elements such as Al, Mg, Si, Na, and Ca would remain below 1 kgm −2 in seawater. Higher Na (in GEO-RSiA-NA) and Ca (in NC-NA and GEO-RSiA-RA) releases were observed in DIW compared to SW, confirming its more aggressive leaching environment. Overall, trace/heavy metal concentrations remained well below Dutch regulatory thresholds, confirming the environmental safety of geopolymer breakwaters. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of recycled silicate–aggregate geopolymers as a sustainable breakwater material with reduced carbon footprint and controlled environmental impact. Further field validation under real hydrodynamic forces is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wijesekara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: