Framework develops a structured approach for measuring impact in education reform, suggesting key improvements.
Theory of Change (ToC) is the dominant lens for impact assessment in education and training reform, but its application is undermined by two structural conditions: the fragmentation of relevant scholarship across partially disconnected traditions, and the absence of a literature-grounded specification of the outcome dimensions against which impact is assessed. This paper develops the Comprehensive Theory of Change for Impact Assessment (CToC-IA), a theoretical framework that addresses both conditions through a structured synthesis of nine strands of scholarship (reviewed and named in Section 2). The synthesis maps these nine strands to a three-tier epistemological architecture (foundations, methodologies, and substantive literatures) to deliver four distinct scientific contributions: (i) the literature-grounded identification of six structural field-level gaps; (ii) the derivation of five outcome dimensions forming the core measurement framework; (iii) the architecture itself as a principled integration device; and (iv) the operationalisation of six design principles across three temporal stages via nine analytical components. The CToC-IA is a theoretical framework with an 2 operational architecture, not yet a validated measurement instrument; its empirical validation is identified as the primary future research priority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renold et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: