Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved landslide susceptibility assessment in Indonesia, indicating enhanced model performance.
Typhoon-induced landslides in coastal mountainous regions are controlled by the coupled effects of rainfall, wind, topography, and storm-track geometry. However, conventional static susceptibility models have limited ability to represent event-scale forcing under extreme weather conditions. This study develops a physics-guided dynamic landslide susceptibility framework and retrospectively applies it to the 2017 Tropical Cyclone Cempaka event in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia, where 743 landslides were identified. The framework integrates static terrain factors, antecedent wetness, event-scale rainfall accumulation and intensity, maximum wind speed, and a typhoon geometric exposure index derived from IBTrACS best-track information that represents track proximity, topographic shielding, rainfall-favored quadrant effects, and storm-motion effects. Under spatial block cross-validation, model performance improved progressively from the static baseline to the full-factor model, with the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) increasing from 0.648 to 0.751, the precision–recall area under the curve (PR-AUC) reaching 0.826, and the F1-score reaching 0.744. The full-factor model also reduced missed landslide cases from 328 to 205 and concentrated predicted high-susceptibility zones along the typhoon exposure corridor. Additional parameter-sensitivity analyses further indicate that the event-based Egeo setting produced positive performance increments under the event-consistent quadrant convention. These results indicate that physically meaningful typhoon-exposure information can improve the spatial discrimination and interpretability of event-scale landslide susceptibility assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: