Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates impact of CGM-measured % time <54 mg/dL on L2 hypoglycemia in individuals with T1D, highlighting critical monitoring metrics.
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-measured % time <54 mg/dL (% T < 54) and level 2 hypoglycemic events (L2 events; ≥15 min <54 mg/dL) in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: These analyses examined the associations between CGM-measured % T < 54 and L2 events from eight clinical trials over 3–6 months in participants with T1D. Results: Data from 1532 participants with T1D were analyzed (mean age 37 ± 21 years; 72% adults): 43% using automated insulin delivery (AID), 43% CGM users not using AID (34% multiple daily injections [MDI]; 66% standard pump), and 14% self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) users not using CGM (58% MDI; 42% standard pump). There was a strong correlation between % T < 54 and L2 event rate ( r = 0.97), but the relationship differed by the average duration of L2 events. For those with 1% T < 54, the predicted L2 event rate per week was 2.4 events for those with short L2 events (average <30 min), 1.9 events for those with medium duration of L2 events (average 30–60 min), and 1.2 events for those with long L2 events (average >60 min). Those meeting hypoglycemic targets (<1% T < 54) had on average 0.6 L2 events per week, irrespective of technology use. Those not meeting targets (≥1% T < 54) had on average 2.9 L2 events per week, but this differed based on technology use and observed % T < 54. Conclusions: L2 event frequency and % T < 54 are strongly correlated, but the relationship differs by L2 event duration. Therefore, both frequency and duration of L2 events should be reported together. Time-below-range metrics incorporate both aspects and are core CGM endpoints that summarize overall amount of hypoglycemia exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calhoun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: