Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-world study evaluates treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma patients aged 65-75, suggesting personalized approaches improve survival.
PURPOSE: The optimal treatment strategy for patients aged 65-75 years with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined, as most clinical trials involving transplant-eligible patients have excluded this subgroup. We investigated the real-world treatment patterns, outcomes, and clinical impact of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and quadruplet therapy in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 561 patients aged 65-75 years with newly diagnosed MM treated between 2015 and 2023 at two tertiary centers. Patients were stratified by age (< 70 vs. ≥ 70 years) and ASCT status. RESULTS: The use of quadruplet regimens and ASCT has increased markedly since 2021. Among patients aged 65-69 years, ASCT was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.53; P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17-0.55; P < 0.001). In those aged 70-75 years, quadruplet therapy was independently associated with superior PFS (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.73; P = 0.009). Similarly, in non-transplant recipients, quadruplet therapy remained a favorable predictor of PFS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.87; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment strategies-including ASCT and quadruplet therapy-are both feasible and beneficial for selected patients with MM aged ≥ 65 years. Therefore, chronological age alone should not be used to determine treatment eligibility. These findings provide real-world evidence that supports a shift toward individualized fitness-based treatment approaches to optimize outcomes in older patients with MM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: