Demonstrates accurate UCS prediction in heterogeneous rock datasets, implying improved engineering design.
Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) is a fundamental parameter for rock engineering design and stability assessment, but direct laboratory testing is costly, time-consuming, and often difficult for weak or fractured rocks. To improve predictive accuracy while preserving mechanical interpretability, this study proposes a Gated Empirical-Law LightGBM model (GEL-LightGBM). The framework embeds three representative rock-strength priors, including point-load strength, multi-index strength, and porosity-degradation relationships, as empirical-law experts. A sample-adaptive gating mechanism dynamically assigns its contributions for different rock states, while a controlled residual corrector captures nonlinear deviations between empirical estimates and measured UCS. Using 344 published rock-mechanics samples, porosity, Schmidt rebound hardness, P-wave velocity, and point-load strength index were used as predictors. GEL-LightGBM outperformed LightGBM, XGBoost, random forest, MLP, CNN, SVR, and BPNN, achieving a testing R2 of 0.9790 and an RMSE of 7.5623 MPa. SHAP analysis identified porosity as the dominant factor, contributing 49.0%, followed by rebound hardness (32.2%) and P-wave velocity (17.2%). The strongest interaction occurred between porosity and rebound hardness (2.31 MPa). These findings indicate that GEL-LightGBM provides accurate, stable, and physically interpretable UCS prediction for heterogeneous rock datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: