PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 26, 2026Energy Policy1 citationsOpen Access

Future scenarios for the benefit of battery storage in the German day-ahead electricity market

View Full Paper
TGThomas GottfriedGMGernot Müller

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effect of battery energy storage systems (BESS) on electricity prices in Germany's day-ahead market.
  • Conducted a backtesting simulation study using econometric methods.
  • Analyzed two scenarios: perfect and imperfect foresight with two types of storage.
  • Assessed impacts of additional storage capacities of 5 GWh and 10 GWh on market prices.
  • An additional 10 GWh of BESS could lower average electricity prices by 2.94 EUR/MWh and reduce the 99%-quantile by 27.7%.
  • Even a moderate capacity of 5 GWh initiated considerable self-cannibalization of BESS returns.
  • Highlights the necessity for public subsidies or new financial mechanisms to incentivize BESS investment.

Abstract

Volatility of electric power prices in Germany has seen an unprecedented increase since 2022, and the ongoing rapid expansion of renewable energy sources (RES) is likely to further reinforce this development. The recent emergence of large-scale battery storage (BESS) is expected to mitigate volatility and enable competitive electricity prices with high RES shares. This paper quantifies the impact of BESS on the day-ahead (DA) electricity price within a backtesting simulation study using econometric methods. We consider two scenarios with perfect and imperfect foresight and distinguish between two types of storage. We find that an additional 10 GWh BESS would have reduced the average electricity price by 2.94 EUR/MWh and the 99%-quantile by 27.7% in 2024. Conversely, even moderate capacities (like 5 GWh) trigger significant self-cannibalization of BESS returns. This implies a missing incentive to invest in BESS, although an extensive expansion of electricity storage is inevitable to reach climate goals. Nevertheless, BESS could improve the efficiency of the DA-market from a holistic macroeconomic perspective, but a change in market conditions would be required to obtain the optimum. Our findings motivate a contemplation of public subsidies for BESS or the introduction of a new “storage levy”.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gottfried et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3e1966030ad1a9b3092276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Battery electricity storage as both a complement and substitute for cross-border interconnection2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Modeling the Merit Order Curve of the European Energy Exchange Power Market in Germany2013 · 37 citations
  3. 3Prediction of extreme price occurrences in the German day-ahead electricity market2016 · 51 citations
  4. 4Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline2021 · 448 citations
  5. 5Impact of Optimal Storage Allocation on Price Volatility in Energy-Only Electricity Markets2017 · 40 citations