Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmark evaluates goal integrity and resilience in autonomous agents, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in AI safety.
AgentShield Bench v3 is a benchmark for evaluating goal integrity, goal hijacking resilience, and autonomous threat resistance in Large Language Model (LLM) agents. The benchmark contains 250 controlled experimental scenarios spanning five adversarial categories: Goal Drift, Tool Manipulation, Long-Horizon Hijacking, Delegation Attacks, and Reward Hacking. Each scenario is evaluated under both clean and adversarial conditions, enabling direct measurement of objective-preservation failures through Goal Integrity Score (GIS), Goal Integrity Drop (GID), Attack Success Rate (ASR), and Task Completion Rate (TCR). AgentShield Bench v3 evaluates the ability of autonomous agents to maintain intended objectives when exposed to adversarial influence during planning, reasoning, tool use, and task execution. The benchmark also includes defensive evaluation mechanisms such as Goal Restatement, Self Verification, and Constraint Locking. This release represents the final installment of the AgentShield benchmark series: • AgentShield Bench v1 — Prompt Injection & Adversarial Agent Workflows• AgentShield Bench v2 — Memory Security & Cross-Session Compromise• AgentShield Bench v3 — Goal Integrity & Autonomous Threats Together, the series provides a benchmark framework spanning prompt-level, memory-level, and goal-level security threats in autonomous AI agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruhulalemeen Mulla (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: