Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validates the ALONE Scale and investigates age-related loneliness in adults, suggesting cultural considerations.
Purpose: This study validates the ALONE Scale (Chinese) and examines its age association. Method: We analyzed 2,019 anonymous adult responses from a nationwide Wenjuanxing survey in China. Using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) curves and logistic regression, we compared age differences in loneliness. Results: The scale demonstrated modest internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .600) and a moderate concurrent association ( r = .606) with the 8-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a cutoff score of 10 (range = 5–15). Logistic regression indicated an inverse association between age and loneliness. The adjusted LOWESS curve revealed a nonlinear age pattern, with peaks at ages 25 and 50; descriptively, peak ages were approximately 10 years later among women than men. Discussion: While the findings support the practicality of the ALONE Scale, users should discuss cultural meanings of these five items, incorporate relational-skill training to address silent struggles, and assess age-related stigma toward loneliness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: