Quantitative survey explores trust dynamics in platform-based services, revealing key relational and functional cues.
This paper proposes and empirically demonstrates the concept of Trust-as-a-Service (TaaS)—a co-constructed, market-driven construct that describes the process of trust formation and emergence in platform-mediated service partnerships. This study investigates and explains the way in which relational cues and functional cues affect trust, as well as the moderating role of customer relationship duration. A cross-sectional, quantitative survey was carried out on a sample of 677 respondents who had used platform-based providers of services in India. Eight trusts constructs were measured: similarity, empathy, politeness, competence, customization, reliability, promptness, and length of relationship. Main effects and moderation hypotheses testing were done by modeling the variables in a hierarchical regression with an interaction structure. Findings show that relational cues (Similarity, Empathy, Politeness) play a significant role in determining trust during the early relationships but fade away with time. By contrast, functional cues (Competence, Customization, Reliability, Promptness) are predictive of long-term relationships. Length of relationship was not directly related to trust nor moderated the impact of any of them, although overall relationships were significant and confirmed the presence of a time pattern in the mechanisms of trust formation. The paper will help develop a more experience-based model of interpreting trust in digital service platforms. It connects to an affective and cognitive view of trust and points out that trust is co-produced and dynamic rather than a fixed act of believing. The TaaS model offers theoretical and empirical lessons for building trust in digitally mediated service spaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: