Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced lithium ion transport in composite solid electrolytes, indicating improved battery performance.
Composite solid electrolytes (CSEs) hold great promise for advancing safer and higher-energy-density solid-state batteries. However, the poor interface compatibility caused by the lithium carbonate (Li 2 CO 3 ) passivation layer on the garnet-type Li 6.4 La 3 Zr 1.7 Ta 0.3 O 12 (LLZTO) surface leads to an inhomogeneous distribution of ceramic particles and discontinuous lithium ion (Li + ) transport, especially for high-content ceramics. Herein, we chemically convert the Li 2 CO 3 layer into brushlike poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate- co -2-(3-(6-methyl-4-oxo-1,4-dihydropyrimidin-2-yl)ureido)ethyl methacrylate (PEGMA- co -UPyMA) polymers. These modified ceramics (LLZTO- g -PEGMA- co -UPyMA) are integrated with a dynamic supramolecular ionic conducting polymer (DSICP) through hydrogen bond coupling, yielding a homogeneous LLZTO- g -PEGMA- co -UPyMA@DSICP CSE with continuous Li + transport pathways, even at 90 weight % ceramic loading. This CSE enables exceptional cycling stability, with Li|LiFePO 4 cells retaining 88.8% capacity after 2000 cycles and 4.4-volt Li|NMC811 cells maintaining 83.7% after 300 cycles. Impressively, the 1.26–ampere hour pouch cell retains 85.6% capacity after 100 cycles, demonstrating unprecedented feasibility for practical solid-state lithium batteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: