Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows treatment response in infants with low-grade glioma, suggesting potential benefit for this group.
Background Infantile LGGs are a challenge to manage because of acute illness at presentation and unpredictable response to standard LGG chemotherapy. Methods We present 3 cases of infants with LGG (ages 4, 6, and 12 months) treated with mirdametinib, a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor with high blood-brain barrier penetration. Results All 3 cases were diagnosed with KIAA1549::BRAF fusion-positive pilocytic astrocytoma. Symptoms for all patients corresponded to tumor location (1 brainstem, 2 suprasellar optic pathway gliomas [OPG]) and included failure to thrive and regression of milestones. All were treated with mirdametinib at 3mg/m2 BID daily (2 first-line and 1 second-line). Overall, treatment was well tolerated, with expected grade 1-2 CPK elevations and grade 1 rash in all patients. One patient required a dose reduction due to neck weakness. The patient with a non-enhancing brainstem tumor had a minor response at 2 months (-32%), and a partial response at 4 months (-55%) that was sustained at 6 months (-63%) by RAPNO criteria. One with OPG had stable disease over 4 months with an incremental decrease in size 2 (-9%) and 4 (-18%) months, and a gradual reduction in tumor enhancement. The second OPG, who had only one disease evaluation after 2 months on MEKi, showed an increase in tumor volume that could be confounded by a 2-week delay between the baseline evaluation and treatment initiation, but with a marked decrease in tumor enhancement. All the infants showed significant improvement in their neurological status, and this improvement was sustained through their most recent follow-up. Supportive care medications were weaned for all 3 patients, and all remain on treatment. Conclusion In the short term, mirdametinib was well tolerated by 3 infants. Two showed progressive reduction in tumor volume, and one showed sustained partial response. More longitudinal follow-up and patients are needed to better report the safety and efficacy of mirdametinib in infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: