Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines the semantic features of m-er and m-ci in Khitan texts, suggesting deeper meanings.
This study combines historical comparative linguistics with the analysis of Khitan Small Script textual materials to examine the semantic functions of the word m-er and its plural form m-ci , which correspond to the Chinese concept of Dao ( dao 道 ). Through a systematic collation and contextual analysis of examples from Khitan Small Script epitaphs and related literary sources, this article argues that m-er and m-ci exhibit layered semantic features in the Khitan Small Script corpus, characterized by the coexistence of abstract and concrete meanings. Furthermore, through a comparison of interchangeable usages of sh-al-s and m-er in Khitan Small Script texts, this study examines their semantic layers, investigating both their shared core meanings and semantic distinctions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bule Sun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: