Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research proposes a framework using relationality to address design challenges for planetary health applications.
Relationality is opening disciplinary pathways offering innovations in a wide range of fields but requires frameworks from which to develop applicable operational tools. Research aimed at such endeavour is presented in this paper; specifically, a taxonomical Relational Tree which classifies bioinfrastructures in hierarchies according to their role as providers for prosperity from which it is possible to define a sequence; a Relational Cycle built from qualities that –it is hypothesized– in conjunction, provide emergent properties towards self-fulfillment. Several design cases are analyzed to validate and/or calibrate the framework as a transitional design tool. Insights include identification for the process to: situate design problems; view soil as having the capacity to include a wide range of interactions; differentiate relations depending on information; distinguish tangible and intangible structures; identify dynamic processes and consider prosperity as cyclical with no specific starting stage; all of which offer applicable scaffolds in many disciplinary fields.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizondo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: