Demonstrates vibration-state monitoring in a motor-support system, indicating a compact sensing solution.
This study demonstrates single-channel fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing for relative vibration-state monitoring of a motor–support system under angle-dependent boundary conditions. A packaged FBG accelerometer-type sensing unit was mounted on the motor–support structure, and the reflected Bragg wavelength was recorded as a one-dimensional optical vibration response. Because the sensor was installed away from the rotating shaft, the measured wavelength fluctuation was interpreted as a coupled vibration-sensitive response of the motor, fixture, sensor package, bonding condition, and changing boundary state, rather than as a calibrated shaft speed or absolute acceleration signal. Adaptive variational mode decomposition (AVMD) was applied to track the time-varying narrowband spectral-response trajectory of the Bragg-wavelength signal. In parallel, raw wavelength windows were supplied to LSTM, 1D-CNN, and CNN–LSTM autoencoders to evaluate waveform departures from learned nominal fixed-angle behavior. The fixed-angle results showed stable but distinguishable optical vibration responses under different boundary states, whereas the dynamic angle-transition records produced local trajectory changes and alarm-candidate intervals. Baseline and autoencoder comparisons further clarified the trade-off between transition coverage and false-alarm tendency. The RMS threshold baseline was more sensitive to transition-related amplitude changes but produced more false alarms, whereas the CNN–LSTM autoencoder provided the most selective response among the tested autoencoder branches. The results are interpreted as task-specific evidence for relative vibration-state transition monitoring rather than as general motor fault diagnosis. Overall, the framework demonstrates a compact FBG-based route for relative vibration-state transition monitoring when speed references, dense sensor layouts, and labeled fault data are unavailable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: