Key result
Small dense LDL-c links to ~29% higher CAC incidence, while large buoyant LDL-c inversely tracks progression.
Why the study?
LDL-c subfractions may play different roles in atherogenesis, motivating evaluation of their associations with CAC incidence and progression.
Do LDL-c subfractions (small dense vs. large buoyant) predict coronary artery calcium incidence and progression in adults?
Cohort (n=2,632)
Do LDL-c subfractions (small dense vs. large buoyant) predict coronary artery calcium incidence and progression in adults?
Small dense LDL-c is associated with incident coronary artery calcium, while large buoyant LDL-c is inversely associated with its progression, suggesting distinct roles for LDL subfractions in atherogenesis.
May inform CAC risk models but should not alter management; hypothesis-generating for distinct LDL subfraction roles.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) subfractions may play different roles in atherogenesis. Our objective was to evaluate the association between LDL-c subfractions and coronary artery calcium (CAC) incidence in individuals with a baseline CAC = 0 and CAC progression in those with CAC > 0 at baseline. METHODS: We include 2632 participants from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health cohort, all of whom underwent two repeated CAC score measurements and had LDL-c subfraction measurements. The LDL-c subfraction concentrations were measured by the vertical auto profile method and categorized as small dense LDL-c (sdLDL-c) and large buoyant LDL-c (lbLDL-c). We constructed logistic regression analyses to examine CAC incidence and CAC progression. Additionally, CAC progression was analyzed using linear regression analyses as continuous variables. RESULTS: At baseline, a total of 2066 individuals (47.2 years, 62.2% female) had CAC = 0 and 566 (53.63 years, 36.9% female) had CAC > 0. The mean interscan interval was (5.15 ± 2.37 years). We found a significant association between sdLDL-c and CAC incidence (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.13-1.47]) but not for lbLDL-c (p = 0.28) after adjustment for confounders. We found no association of the sdLDL-c fraction with CAC progression in any of the analyses. However, lbLDL-c concentrations were inversely associated with CAC progression on both logistic and linear regression analyses (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a positive association between incidence of CAC and sdLDL-c but not lbLDL-c. CAC progression was inversely associated with lbLDL-c but not with sdLDL-c.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farooq et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery calcium (CAC) incidence and progression (n=2,632). Small dense LDL-c (sdLDL-c) and large buoyant LDL-c (lbLDL-c) was evaluated on Coronary artery calcium (CAC) incidence (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13-1.47). Small dense LDL-c was significantly associated with coronary artery calcium incidence (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.13-1.47), while large buoyant LDL-c was inversely associated with CAC progression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: