Key result
Edoxaban matches warfarin for stroke prevention in women while providing greater reductions in serious bleeding.
Why the study?
Female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke and systemic embolic events in atrial fibrillation, prompting evaluation of the efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban in women versus men.
Does edoxaban improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to warfarin differently in women versus men with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=21,105)
Double-blind, double-dummy
Randomly assigned
Yes
Does edoxaban improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to warfarin differently in women versus men with atrial fibrillation?
Edoxaban provides similar stroke prevention efficacy to warfarin in both sexes, but offers a significantly greater reduction in severe bleeding outcomes in women compared to men.
Favors edoxaban over warfarin in women with AF for greater bleeding safety; extends sex-specific anticoagulant data from prior NOAC trials.
Background: Female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety profile of edoxaban in women versus men. Methods: The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) randomly assigned 21 105 patients (8040 women) with atrial fibrillation and CHADS 2 score ≥2 either to a higher-dose edoxaban regimen, a lower-dose edoxaban regimen, or warfarin. The primary end points of the trial were the composite of stroke or systemic embolic events (efficacy), and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis–defined major bleeding (safety). Results: In comparison with men, women were older, had lower body weight, were more likely to have hypertension and renal dysfunction, but less likely to smoke, drink alcohol, or have diabetes or coronary artery disease. Pretreatment endogenous factor Xa activity was significantly higher in women than in men (92.5% versus 86.1%, P <0.001). Treatment with edoxaban in women resulted in greater peak edoxaban concentration and inhibition of endogenous factor Xa in comparison with men, resulting in similar endogenous factor Xa activity between the sexes 2 to 4 hours after dose. Treatment with higher-dose edoxaban regimen (versus warfarin) resulted in similar reduction in the risk of stroke/systemic embolic events (women: hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [0.69–1.11], men: HR, 0.87 [0.71–1.06]; P -interaction=0.97) and major bleeding (women: HR, 0.74 [0.59–0.92], men: HR, 0.84 [0.72–0.99]; P -interaction=0.34) in women and men. However, women assigned to higher-dose edoxaban regimen experienced greater reductions in hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.15–0.59] versus HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.46–1.06]), intracranial bleeding (HR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10–0.39] versus HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44–0.89]), and life-threatening or fatal bleeding (HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.15–0.42] versus HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54–0.96]) than men (each P -interaction<0.05). Conclusions: Despite many differences in baseline characteristics between women and men and higher baseline endogenous factor Xa levels in women, the intensity of anticoagulation achieved with edoxaban between the sexes was similar. Treatment with higher-dose edoxaban regimen resulted in an even greater reduction in hemorrhagic stroke and several serious bleeding outcomes in women than in men, whereas the efficacy profile was similar between sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zelniker et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Atrial Fibrillation (n=21,105). Edoxaban vs. Warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) was evaluated on First occurrence of stroke or systemic embolic events (efficacy in women) (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69-1.11, p=0.97 for interaction). Compared to warfarin, edoxaban reduced stroke/SEE similarly in women (HR 0.87) and men, but provided significantly greater reductions in serious bleeding outcomes in women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: