Key result
This review classifies cardiac pseudotumors into intrinsic and extrinsic origins and details their pertinent echocardiographic features to aid in differentiating them from true neoplasms.
This review provides a classification and echocardiographic description of intrinsic and extrinsic cardiac pseudotumors to aid in distinguishing them from true neoplasms.
Echocardiography remains first-line for cardiac pseudotumors; review extends awareness but leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic criteria.
Echocardiography is the most common imaging modality for the assessment of cardiovascular tumors, followed by more advanced imaging modalities, such as cardiac computed tomography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Non-neoplastic lesions that may simulate a true neoplasm on imaging are termed "cardiac pseudotumors." As echocardiography is the initial imaging modality where pseudotumors are identified, it is imperative to have a fundamental understanding of pseudotumors evaluation using echocardiography. There is paucity of the literature describing the different kinds of pseudotumors. This review is an attempt to describe common cardiac pseudotumors and to classify them based on their origin. The tumors arising from cardiac structures, such as epicardium, endocardium, or myocardium, were termed as "intrinsic" while the pseudotumors with no cardiac origin were termed as "extrinsic." The more common pseudotumors are described in detail with pertinent echocardiographic features and examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maybrook et al. (2015) conducted a review in Cardiac pseudotumors. Echocardiography was evaluated. This review classifies cardiac pseudotumors into intrinsic and extrinsic origins and details their pertinent echocardiographic features to aid in differentiating them from true neoplasms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: