PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1997SIAM Journal on Computing1,551 citations

Quantum Complexity Theory

View Full Paper
EBEthan BernsteinUVUmesh Vazirani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this paper we study quantum computation from a complexity theoretic viewpoint. Our first result is the existence of an efficient universal quantum Turing machine in Deutsch's model of a quantum Turing machine (QTM) Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 400 (1985), pp. 97--117. This construction is substantially more complicated than the corresponding construction for classical Turing machines (TMs) ; in fact, even simple primitives such as looping, branching, and composition are not straightforward in the context of quantum Turing machines. We establish how these familiar primitives can be implemented and introduce some new, purely quantum mechanical primitives, such as changing the computational basis and carrying out an arbitrary unitary transformation of polynomially bounded dimension. We also consider the precision to which the transition amplitudes of a quantum Turing machine need to be specified. We prove that O (T) bits of precision suffice to support a T step computation. This justifies the claim that the quantum Turing machine model should be regarded as a discrete model of computation and not an analog one. We give the first formal evidence that quantum Turing machines violate the modern (complexity theoretic) formulation of the Church--Turing thesis. We show the existence of a problem, relative to an oracle, that can be solved in polynomial time on a quantum Turing machine, but requires superpolynomial time on a bounded-error probabilistic Turing machine, and thus not in the class. The class of languages that are efficiently decidable (with small error-probability) on a quantum Turing machine satisfies ^. Therefore, there is no possibility of giving a mathematical proof that quantum Turing machines are more powerful than classical probabilistic Turing machines (in the unrelativized setting) unless there is a major breakthrough in complexity theory.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bernstein et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f1f705df9781267076d15https://doi.org/10.1137/s0097539796300921
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1On the Power of Quantum Computation1997 · 1,340 citations
  2. 2Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing1997 · 1,501 citations
  3. 3Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer1985 · 4,651 citations
  4. 4Simulating physics with computers1982 · 7,626 citations
  5. 5Logical Reversibility of Computation1973 · 3,734 citations