Retrospective study compares clinical and molecular characteristics in early-onset biliary tract cancers, highlighting distinct profiles.
Background The incidence of early-onset biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder adenocarcinoma, is rising, but factors underlying this trend remain unclear. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study of BTC patients across three Mayo Clinic sites (2008-2024). Patients were categorized as early-onset (aged <50 years) or older-onset (aged ≥50 years). Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, molecular alterations, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 549 patients were included; 170 were enriched for early-onset cases, compared with a cohort of older-onset patients ( n = 379) identified through the TEMPUS registry. Compared with older-onset patients [median age 68.0 years, interquartile range (IQR) 60.4, 73.0], early-onset patients (median age 40.5 years, IQR 34.5, 45.1) had significantly fewer metabolic comorbidities, higher frequency of FGFR2 alteration (18.8% versus 6.3%, P < 0.001) and lower frequency of KRAS alteration (15.3% versus 23.0%, P = 0.040). Tumor mutational burden was modestly lower in early-onset disease (3.0 versus 3.7 mutations/megabase, P = 0.003). Early-onset patients were more likely to enroll in clinical trials (25.9% versus 14.0%, P < 0.001) and received more lines of therapy ( P = 0.005). Overall survival did not differ significantly between age groups. Among patients receiving first-line gemcitabine–cisplatin with immune checkpoint inhibition, progression-free survival was similar between early-onset and older-onset disease (7.6 versus 6.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.12; P = 0.59). Conclusions Early-onset BTC demonstrated distinct clinical and molecular profiles, but survival outcomes remained comparable to older-onset BTC. These findings highlight the need for further research into specific oncogenic drivers and tailored therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Donnell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: