Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows that alkyne substituents and X-ligands affect insertion reactions in complexes, indicating specific reactivity trends.
The reactions of diaryl alkynes ArC≡CAr with RuHX(CO)(PPh 3 ) 3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I, H, N 3, NCS, CN) were investigated. The halide complexes RuHX(CO)(PPh 3 ) 3 (X = Cl, Br, I) undergo alkyne insertion reactions with the diaryl alkynes ArC≡CAr (Ar = p -C 6 H 4 OMe, Ph, p -C 6 H 4 CO 2 Me) at room temperature to afford alkenyl complexes RuX(ArC═CHAr)(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 . A substituent effect was observed, with alkynes bearing electron-withdrawing groups displaying higher reactivity. The insertion reaction is also strongly influenced by the X-ligands. The rate of the alkyne insertion of the halide complexes follows the order of Cl < Br < I. In contrast, complexes bearing the π-donor F, the purely σ-donor H, and π-acceptors such as N 3, NCS, and CN, exhibit significantly reduced reactivity toward alkyne insertion with ArC≡CAr under ambient conditions. Density functional theory calculations reveal that phosphine dissociation, leading to the formation of a five-coordinate intermediate RuHX(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2, and subsequent alkyne coordination are two key steps governing the overall reactivity. These steps are influenced by the steric and electronic properties of the X-ligands, as well as the alkyne substituents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: