PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2026Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal0 citations

A novel risk score based on exercise capacity to predict prognosis in adults with congenital heart disease

View Full Paper
SDSandra Dalman-SkogbyUWUrban WiklundAWAnna Wikner

Key Result

A novel 5-point risk score incorporating exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity predicted 10-year mortality in adults with congenital heart disease, with rates ranging from 1% to 34%.

Key Points

  • To develop a risk score utilizing exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity for predicting 10-year mortality in adults with congenital heart disease.
  • Used data from the Swedish National Register of Congenital Heart Disease.
  • Included adults aged 18 to 60 who completed a bicycle ergometer exercise test.
  • Constructed a 5-point risk score based on exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity with follow-up for mortality.
  • 1,525 patients were followed for ten years, with 104 deaths recorded.
  • The risk scores ranged from 0 to 5, correlating with 10-year mortality rates from 1% to 34%.
  • The risk score showed an AUC of 0.72 for training data and 0.70 for validation.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=1,525)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Can a novel risk score incorporating exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity predict 10-year all-cause mortality in adults with congenital heart disease?

P
Population
1,525 adults aged 18 to 60 years with congenital heart disease who completed a bicycle ergometer exercise test, followed for up to 10 years.
E
Exposure
A novel 5-point risk score incorporating exercise capacity (% predicted), age, and lesion complexity
O
Outcome
10-year all-cause mortalityhard clinical

A simple 5-point risk score using exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity can effectively stratify 10-year all-cause mortality risk in adults with congenital heart disease.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise capacity (EC) is a key prognostic indicator in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), closely associated with all-cause mortality. Thus, EC may serve a valuable tool for risk-stratification in ACHD. We propose a novel risk score incorporating EC, age, and lesion complexity to improve mortality risk prediction in ACHD. METHODS: This observational study utilized data from the Swedish National Register of Congenital Heart Disease. Adults aged 18 to 60 years who had completed at least one bicycle ergometer exercise test were included. EC was classified according to percentage of predicted capacity (% ECpred): normal (>70%), moderately impaired (50-70%), severely impaired (<50%). Patients were followed for ten years or until death. Odds ratios for mortality were used to derive a 5-point risk-score to estimate 10-year mortality, with the following point allocation: % ECpred 50-70 = 1 point, <50% = 2 points; age 25-40 years = 1 point, 40-60 years = 2 points; moderate/severe lesion complexity = 1 point. Internal validation of risk score resulted in a median AUC of 0.72 for training data, and 0.70 for test data. RESULTS: In total, 1,525 patients (mean age 31.1 ± 11.8 years; 44% women) were included, where 104 deaths occurred during follow-up. Risk scores ranged from 0 to 5, corresponding to 10-year mortality rates of 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 18%, and 34%, respectively.'Conclusion:A simple risk score incorporating exercise capacity, age, and congenital heart lesion complexity can effectively stratify ACHD patients to 10-year risk of all-cause mortality following an exercise test.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dalman-Skogby et al. (2026) conducted an observational in congenital heart disease (n=1,525). Exercise capacity-based risk score was evaluated on 10-year all-cause mortality. A novel 5-point risk score incorporating exercise capacity, age, and lesion complexity predicted 10-year mortality in adults with congenital heart disease, with rates ranging from 1% to 34%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f67e2aea7db3c1953f2f6https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2026.2690782
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper