This paper proposes a unifying interpretation of biological and artificial cognitive systems as instances of a broader class of transforming systems. These systems exhibit directional behavior not as a consequence of intention or goal-directed agency, but as a result of structural constraints and the presence of gradients in quantities such as entropy [1] or uncertainty. Biological systems maintain internal structure by locally resisting entropy increase [1][2], while artificial systems - particularly predictive models - reduce uncertainty through probabilistic inference. Both processes can be understood as asymmetric responses to disequilibrium. We argue that this behavior reflects a more general principle: transforming systems respond to gradients in the quantities they process. This perspective provides a conceptual foundation for understanding response generation, stability, and the apparent “activity” of both natural and artificial systems without invoking teleological assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartosz Szlifierski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: