Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved segmentation accuracy in facial analysis, suggesting effective deep learning methods.
A deep learning model of segmentation and analysis of facial components combining efficient preprocessing, hybrid segmentation, multi-feature extraction, and cooperative feature selection. The preprocessing step uses Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), Tensorial Adaptive Anisotropic Diffusion (TAAD) and Active Appearance Modeling (AAM) to improve the image clarity and structural integrity. The segmentation is done with a SqueezeNetAttention U-Net hybrid architecture that combines the performance lightweight of SqueezeNet with space attention of Attention U-Net to ensure that the component is properly delineated. Multi-source feature extraction combines Local Phase Congruency (LPC), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), Color Histograms, Gradient Orientation Tensor (GOT) and ResNet embeddings to extract a variety of facial signals. A hybrid feature-selection method, termed Hybrid BFO-SBO Feature Selection (HBFS), is proposed, which consecutively employs Bacterial Foraging Optimization (BFO) for global exploration and Secretary-Bird Optimization (SBO) for local exploitation. Finally, facial component detection is performed using the proposed DEEPFACS framework, in which a ResAttNet-LSTM network jointly integrates a ResNet backbone, self-attention blocks, and LSTM units to effectively learn spatial relationships and achieve accurate classification. The experimental assessments on CelebAMask-HQ and Helen datasets show that the segmentation accuracy (98.7%) and robustness are better than the baseline feature-selection methods. The framework has a low inference latency and used in real-time facial component analysis and human computer interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: