Qualitative study reveals the complexity of discharges against medical advice in homeless individuals, suggesting systemic reforms.
Discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA) disproportionately affects individuals experiencing homelessness, who leave hospitals AMA at rates four times higher than housed populations [Choi M, Kim H, Qian H, Palepu A. Readmission Rates of Patients Discharged against Medical Advice: A Matched Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(9):e24459]. Common explanations emphasize patient non-compliance, overlooking systemic, environmental, and clinician-level factors [FNU Jaydev, Gavin W, Russ J, Holmes E, Kumar V, Sadowski J, et al. Discharges against medical advice: time to take another look. A retrospective review of discharges against medical advice focused on prevention. Hospital Practice. 2023;51(5):288–294]. This qualitative study bridges a gap by comparing self-reported experiences of eight adults experiencing homelessness discharged AMA from an urban academic hospital in a small New-England state with their electronic medical record (EMR) documentation. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and EMR review and analyzed thematically to identify alignments and discrepancies. Results reveal that AMA discharges are often rational responses to a complex crisis of mistrust, multi-systemic neglect, and institutional stigma rather than individual failings. Participants described pervasive stereotyping, communication breakdowns, punitive institutional responses such as withdrawal of follow-up care, and re-traumatization upon re-engagement with healthcare. These findings challenge dominant narratives by framing AMA discharges as structurally compelled exits driven by institutional pathologies, rather than by poor individual decision-making. The study calls for systemic reform, including renaming AMA to “patient-directed” or “self-managed” discharge to reduce stigma, adopting harm reduction approaches that maintain access to care, improving patient-centered communication, and strengthening collaboration with community providers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buscher et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: