Explores how platform design impacts consumer welfare and market share for firms, suggesting significant benefits from tailored contracts.
We study the optimal design of a monopoly platform that interacts with heterogeneous firms and consumers who face uncertainty about product values and prices. Consumers search randomly among firms recommended by the platform. The platform designs a menu of contracts tailored to different firm types and allocates consumer visits across these firms. We show that the optimal platform design creates a “superstar effect,” whereby high‐type firms capture a disproportionately large market share, and improves consumer welfare relative to the no‐design benchmark.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wenzhang Zhang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: