Cross-sectional survey explores treatment choices and burden of myelofibrosis in multiple countries, highlighting critical areas for improvement.
AIM: To explore physicians and patients' views on managing myelofibrosis (MF) with anemia, and impact on quality of life, disease burden, and treatment choices. METHODS: Adelphi MF I Disease Specific Programme™ data were derived from a cross-sectional survey, with retrospective data collected from hematologists/hemato-oncologists and patients in Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and Canada (May2024-January2025). RESULTS: Eighty-six physicians completed the survey. Most considered improving/stabilizing hemoglobin (83-90%), reducing MF symptom severity (84-92%), and reducing transfusions (83-89%) as very/extremely important attributes in treatment choice.Overall, 283 patients completed patient record forms (median age: 70 years; 58% male). At symptom-onset, 69% had anemia. Median hemoglobin levels at anemia diagnosis and before first blood transfusion: 9.0 g/dL and 7.0 g/dL. First-line treatment was primarily ruxolitinib (99%). Overall, patients with anemia vs without had a mean ruxolitinib dosage of 19.1 mg/day vs 25.2 mg/day. Median duration in the clinic to receive transfusion was 4.0 hours. Patients were "dissatisfied" or "neither satisfied/dissatisfied" with hospital visits for transfusions (71%), symptom reduction/control (41%), and the number and severity of side effects (59%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with MF had anemia and received first-line ruxolitinib. Improving hemoglobin levels and reducing symptom severity and transfusion burden are critical for guiding treatment choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: