Evaluates bond strength and surface characteristics in dentin with iron contamination, indicating cautious use of gallic acid.
Objectives This study evaluated the effects of two universal adhesives, applied under three protocols, self-etch (SE), conventional total-etch (CTE), and modified total-etch (MTE) with 1% (w/v) gallic acid, on shear bond strength (SBS), iron retention, and surface characteristics of noncontaminated and ferric sulfate-contaminated dentin. Materials and methods One hundred eighty dentin specimens prepared from ninety extracted human molars were allocated to 12 groups ( n = 15) by adhesive type (All Bond Universal [ABU] or Tokuyama Universal Bond [TUB]), application protocol (SE, CTE, or MTE), and contamination condition (noncontaminated or 20% ferric sulfate-contaminated [ViscoStat]. After composite build-up and 5,000x thermocycling, SBS was measured. Surface morphology ( n = 3, 6 groups) and elemental composition ( n = 5, 5 groups) were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). SBS data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results All three variables significantly affected SBS ( p < 0.001). SE yielded the lowest SBS values (17.46 ± 3.19 MPa) among all protocols ( p < 0.001). CTE and MTE protocols showed comparable SBS values (20.30 ± 3.20 vs. 20.80 ± 3.05 MPa; p = 0.591). After ferric sulfate contamination, CTE produced no detectable iron residue, whereas MTE retained iron-associated surface deposits. EDS revealed descriptively higher mineral content in gallic acid-conditioned dentin, and SEM showed protocol-dependent surface patterns. Conclusions Gallic acid yielded short-term bond strength comparable to phosphoric acid, while inducing a more conservative surface modification. However, gallic acid conditioning following ferric sulfate contamination should be regarded cautiously, as iron-associated deposits are preserved. Clinical relevance Gallic acid may be considered a conservative preconditioning option for noncontaminated dentin. After ferric sulfate contamination, phosphoric acid remains the more predictable choice given its iron-removal capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasibe Aycan Yılmaz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: