Key result
TTE-guided LBBP linked to ~67% shorter fluoroscopy time and comparable capture success versus fluoroscopy guidance.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch pacing often requires prolonged fluoroscopy, creating a need for alternative imaging strategies to reduce radiation exposure and procedural burden.
Does TTE-guided LBBP reduce fluoroscopy time and maintain procedural success compared to fluoroscopy-guided LBBP in patients requiring permanent pacing?
Cohort (n=140)
No
Does TTE-guided LBBP reduce fluoroscopy time and maintain procedural success compared to fluoroscopy-guided LBBP in patients requiring permanent pacing?
TTE-guided LBBP is a feasible and safe alternative to fluoroscopy-guided LBBP, significantly reducing radiation exposure while maintaining comparable procedural success and long-term pacing parameters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TTE guidance may reduce fluoroscopy time in LBBP without compromising success; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a physiological pacing modality, offering advantages over traditional pacing and a higher implant success rate than His bundle pacing. Nevertheless, the procedure often requires prolonged fluoroscopy, increasing radiation exposure for patients and operators. Alternative imaging strategies are needed to reduce procedural burden and mitigate radiation risk. Purpose This study aimed to compare initial procedural performance and long-term clinical outcomes of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)–guided versus fluoroscopy–guided LBBP in patients requiring permanent pacing. Method We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent LBBP between April 2022 and July 2024. Procedural characteristics, including procedure and fluoroscopy times, pacing parameters, electrophysiological findings, and complications were assessed at implantation and during follow-up in both the TTE–guided and fluoroscopy–guided LBBP groups. Result A total of 140 patients (57.9% female; mean age 75.5 years) were included, with 118 undergoing TTE-guided and 22 fluoroscopy-guided LBBP. Left ventricular septal pacing was achieved in all patients, and the success rate of LBB capture was comparable between groups (84.1% vs 73.7%; p = 0.27). Lead implantation time was similar between groups (28.2 vs 36.8 minutes; p = 0.08), whereas fluoroscopy time was significantly lower with TTE guidance (61.2 vs 183.7 seconds; p < 0.01). Pacing parameters, electrophysiological characteristics, and complication rates did not differ significantly at implantation or during up to 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion TTE-guided LBBP is a feasible and safe approach. Compared with conventional fluoroscopy, TTE guidance achieved comparable procedural efficiency, stable long-term pacing parameters, and similar LBB capture success, while markedly reducing radiation exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients requiring permanent pacing (n=140). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-guided left bundle branch pacing vs. Fluoroscopy-guided left bundle branch pacing was evaluated on Success rate of left bundle branch capture (p=0.27). Transthoracic echocardiography-guided left bundle branch pacing reduced fluoroscopy time (61.2 vs 183.7 seconds; p<0.01) with comparable LBB capture success (84.1% vs 73.7%; p=0.27).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: