Key result
Catheter ablation for SVT in Fontan patients achieves ~76% acute success with low complications.
Why the study?
Electrophysiological features of SVT and the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients with Fontan circulation are not well known.
What are the electrophysiological features, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for SVT in patients with Fontan circulation?
Observational (n=39)
Yes
What are the electrophysiological features, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for SVT in patients with Fontan circulation?
Catheter ablation for SVT in patients with Fontan circulation is effective and safe, with intraatrial reentrant tachycardia and focal atrial tachycardia being the most common mechanisms.
Introduction Electrophysiological features of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients with Fontan circulation are not well known. This study aimed to elucidate the electrophysiological features of SVT, efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients who underwent Fontan procedure. Methods A total of 39 patients (age, 27.9 ± 9.8 years, 21 men) with Fontan circulation who had undergone catheter ablation for SVT were retrospectively included. SVT includes atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia involving twin atrioventricular nodes (AVRT-TN), focal atrial tachycardia (AT), intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART), and atrial fibrillation (AF). The characteristics of underlying congenital heart disease, Fontan type, how to puncture the Fontan conduit, tachycardia mechanisms, acute success rate, complications, and recurrence rate of catheter ablation were analyzed. Results Forty-nine SVTs were induced and 58 procedures were performed. Congenital heart diseases of the patients were as follows: atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) + double outlet right ventricle (DORV) (20.5%), tricuspid atresia (TA) (15.4%), AVSD (10.3%), AVSD + pulmonary atresia (PA) (7.7%), DORV (7.7%), DORV + double inlet right ventricle (DIRV) (5.1%), DORV + mitral atresia (MA) (5.1%), DORV + transposition of the great arteries (TGA) (5.1%), PA (5.1%), et al. Fontan types were as follows: APC (17.9%), lateral tunnel (38.5%), and extracardiac conduit (43.6%). Inducible tachycardias were intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (36.7%), focal atrial tachycardia (24.5%), atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia (12.2%), AV reciprocating tachycardia involving twin atrioventricular nodes (12.2%), AV reentrant tachycardia (8.2%), and atrial fibrillation (6.1%). Acute success and complication rates per procedure and recurrence rate per patient were 75.9%, 5.2%, and 28.2% respectively. Conclusions IART and focal AT are the most common tachycardia in patients with Fontan circulation. Catheter ablation for SVT after Fontan conduit puncture is effective and safe in patients with lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit Fontan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uhm et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in Fontan circulation (n=39). Catheter ablation was evaluated on Acute success rate. Catheter ablation for supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with Fontan circulation achieved an acute success rate of 75.9%, with a 5.2% complication rate and 28.2% recurrence rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: