Why the study?
Identifying individuals with COPD at high risk of significant health events like exacerbations and hospital admissions is clinically important to guide preventative interventions.
Does the GOLD 2026 ABE assessment tool predict hospitalised acute exacerbations in patients with COPD?
Does the GOLD 2026 ABE assessment tool predict hospitalised acute exacerbations in patients with COPD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The GOLD 2026 ABE tool effectively identifies COPD patients at high risk for severe exacerbations, though classification varies depending on whether CAAT or mMRC is used.
Identifying people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are at high risk of significant health events such as exacerbations and hospital admissions is clinically important to guide optimisation of preventative interventions. We evaluated the utility of the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2026 ABE assessment tool which stratifies based on exacerbations or symptoms to distinguish these patients at high risk. METHODS: irways Disease) COPD cohort were classified into GOLD ABE groups using both the Chronic Airways Assessment Tool (CAAT) score and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale to define the degree of symptoms. National Health Service hospital episode statistics data were prospectively collected for a median follow-up of 4.75 years. Hospital admissions, including for acute exacerbations of COPD (H-AECOPD (hospitalised acute exacerbations of COPD)), were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses with ORs adjusted for potential confounding factors were performed. RESULTS: Using CAAT, n=43/182/439 (7%/27%/66%) of participants were in groups A, B and E, respectively. By mMRC, n=144/81/439 (22%/12%/66%) were in groups A, B and E. The ABE tool derived using both CAAT and mMRC predicted H-AECOPD over follow-up. For group B versus group A by CAAT, the OR was 3.72 (95% CI 1.09 to 12.73, p=0.04), and for group E versus group A the OR was 8.13 (95% CI 2.45 to 26.92, p<0.001). By mMRC, for group B versus group A the OR was 2.69 (95% CI 1.36 to 5.32, p=0.005) and for group E versus group A the OR was 4.05 (95% CI 2.38 to 6.05, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective real-world UK cohort, the simple GOLD 2026 ABE tool identified patients with high-risk COPD for severe exacerbations (H-AECOPD). The differences in groups A and B classification depending on whether the CAAT score or mMRC scale is used have clinical implications that need consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adesoye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: