Why the study?
The level of hemolysis induced by PFA varies between systems, and data on hemolysis induced by the novel balloon-in-basket catheter are scarce.
Does the balloon-in-basket catheter reduce hemolysis compared to pentaspline and variable-loop circular catheters in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation?
Does the balloon-in-basket catheter reduce hemolysis compared to pentaspline and variable-loop circular catheters in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation?
The novel balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation catheter induces significantly less hemolysis compared to contemporary pentaspline and variable-loop circular catheters during pulmonary vein isolation.
BIBC linked to least hemolysis among PFA catheters; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction The level of hemolysis induced by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) varies between PFA systems. Data on hemolysis induced by the novel balloon-in-basket catheter (BIBC) is scarce. We compared the levels of hemolysis observed with the 3 most commonly used, commercially available single-shot PFA catheters: pentaspline catheter (PSC), variable-loop circular catheter (VLCC) and BIBC. Methods Patients undergoing PVI were prospectively enrolled in a registry. BIBC cases were matched to VLCC and PSC cases using TriMatch, an algorithm creating matched triplets. Pre- and postprocedural measurements included LDH, total and direct bilirubin, haptoglobin and creatinine. Absolute and relative differences were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results One hundred and nine patients were included in this study (26% female, 37% persistent AF). Of the final matched cohort, 43 patients underwent PVI with the BIBC, 37 with the PSC and 29 with the VLCC. Baseline characteristics and baseline hemolysis markers were similar across patient groups, the BIBC group did not include redo interventions (Table). The BIBC had the lowest post-interventional decrease in haptoglobin concentration (Figure panel a): Δ Haptoglobin -0.18 vs -0.66 (vs. PSC: p<0.001), vs -0.56 g/L (vs. VLCC: p<0.001). Direct and total bilirubin increase was lowest in the BIBC Group (Figure panel b and c): Δ Direct bilirubin 0.75 vs 2.1 (vs. PSC: p<0.001) vs 2.1 µmol/L (vs. VLCC: p<0.01). Δ Total bilirubin 1.9 vs 6.3 (vs. PSC: p< 0.001) vs 4.6 µmol/L (vs. VLCC: p<0.05). The PSC group showed a significantly larger increase in LDH compared to the BIBC, but there was no significant difference in Δ LDH to the VLCC (Figure panel d). Changes in creatinine/eGFR (Figure panels e/f) did not differ (all comparisons p>0.1). No patient developed acute kidney injury. Conclusions The magnitude of hemolysis is PFA system dependent. The novel BIBC shows the smallest increase in hemolysis markers after PVI while the VLCC and PSC have similar hemolytic signatures. No significant difference in impact on renal function was observed between the catheters. Further studies are necessary to identify potential clinical relevance of these findings.FigureTable
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: