Key result
Higher heart rate fragmentation is linked to AF recurrence after catheter ablation.
Why the study?
Traditional HRV has limited prognostic value for AF recurrence after catheter ablation, prompting investigation into whether HRF after ablation predicts recurrence.
Does heart rate fragmentation predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients after catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=143)
Does heart rate fragmentation predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients after catheter ablation?
Heart rate fragmentation, particularly the percentage of inflection points, serves as a novel and superior predictor for atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation compared to traditional heart rate variability.
Hypothesis-generating for HRF in post-ablation AF stratification; prospective validation required before clinical adoption.
Background Traditional heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has been used to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation for AF, but its prognostic value is limited. Heart rate fragmentation (HRF), a recently introduced method that quantifies beat-to-beat irregularity in cardiac interbeat intervals, has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events and with the development of atrial fibrillation in the general population. Several studies have shown that HRF outperforms conventional HRV indices in predicting clinical outcomes. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the HRF values after AF catheter ablation could predict the recurrence of AF. Methods This study enrolled the 143patients who underwent AF radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). HRF and HRV were assessed from a 24-hour Holter monitoring acquired on the day after RFCA. The primary outcome was the development of AF. Results A total of 143 patients (mean age, 57.1 ± 12.9 years; male, 58.3%; paroxysmal AF, 54%) underwent AF RFCA and 24-hour Holter monitoring were analyzed. During an average follow-up of 37.6 months, 34 patients developed AF. Higher percentage of inflection points (PIP, P<0.001) as HRF parameter and higher HRV parameters including high-frequency (P = 0.02) and the square root of the mean squared differences (P=0.01) were associated with the development of AF. Conclusion The HRF value, especially PIP, is better predictor for AF recurrence after AF RFCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chun et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=143). Heart rate fragmentation (HRF) was evaluated on Development of atrial fibrillation (recurrence) (p=<0.001). Higher heart rate fragmentation, specifically a higher percentage of inflection points, was significantly associated with the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: