Why the study?
IgG4-related constrictive pericarditis is rare with no standardized treatment, and surgical pericardiectomy is challenging because conventional energy devices carry risks of thermal damage to phrenic nerves and the heart.
Does a microwave ablation device prevent nerve injury and ensure hemostatic control during radical pericardiectomy in a patient with IgG4-related constrictive pericarditis?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does a microwave ablation device prevent nerve injury and ensure hemostatic control during radical pericardiectomy in a patient with IgG4-related constrictive pericarditis?
A microwave ablation device may offer a safe alternative to conventional energy devices for radical pericardiectomy by minimizing thermal damage and nerve injury.
May facilitate safer pericardiectomy in IgG4-related CP; leaves open need for validation in larger studies.
INTRODUCTION: Immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a rare condition with no standardized treatment. Surgical pericardiectomy is challenging due to dense adhesions and the risk of injury to the phrenic nerves and heart. Conventional energy devices carry risks of thermal damage. We report a novel application of a microwave ablation device (Acrosurg; Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) for radical pericardiectomy, highlighting its advantages in preventing nerve injury and ensuring hemostatic control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiriya et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Immunoglobulin G4-related constrictive pericarditis (n=1). Microwave ablation device (Acrosurg) assisted pericardiectomy was evaluated on Surgical success and symptom resolution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: