Why the study?
Management of oral anticoagulation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for common atrial flutter remains controversial, especially in patients without prior atrial fibrillation, with limited evidence and a lack of randomized trials.
Does discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation affect the risk of stroke, bleeding, or new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with common atrial flutter?
Does discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation affect the risk of stroke, bleeding, or new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with common atrial flutter?
Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation appears safe in selected low-risk patients without prior atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support individualized OAC decisions post-CTI ablation in lower-risk patients; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
Introduction Management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for common atrial flutter (CAF) remains controversial, particularly in patients without prior atrial fibrillation (AF). Meta-analyses suggest that discontinuing OAC after successful ablation may reduce bleeding risk without clearly increasing thromboembolic events. However, available evidence is limited, and randomized clinical trials are lacking. Purpose To evaluate the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events following CTI ablation and to identify potential predictors of new-onset AF and stroke during follow-up. Methods Prospective, single-center observational study including patients who underwent CTI ablation between Jan/22 and Dec/24. Baseline characteristics, AF history, CHA2DS2-VA score, and periprocedural findings were recorded; clinical outcomes during follow-up were registered. Results 130 patients were included (82.3% male, mean age 67.4 ± 11.6 years), with a median CHA2DS2-VA score of 3 [1–4]. Prior AF was documented in 39%. Prior cardiomyopathy was present in 52.3% of patients, most commonly valvular (20%), hypertensive (16.2%) and ischaemic (10%) cardiomyopathies, with median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% [48-60]. Left atrial (LA) enlargement was frequent (64.6%), with a median diameter of 43 [40-48] mm. OAC was discontinued after a mean of 3.8 ± 3.1 months after CTI ablation in 44.6% of patients (those without prior AF or with low embolic risk). Over a mean follow-up of 24 ± 10 months, CAF recurrence was documented in one patient (time to recurrence 6 months), requiring repeat ablation. AF occurred in 27 patients (20.8%), 10 of them de novo (7.6%). Four embolic strokes (3.1%), six major (4.6%) and five minor (3.8%) bleeding events, and 12 deaths (9.2%) were recorded, none procedure related. Patients who discontinued OAC had lower CHA2DS2-VA scores and less prior AF, with no significant differences in stroke, bleeding, or mortality (Table 1, Figure 1). In multivariable analysis, larger LA diameter showed a trend toward an increased risk of new-onset AF (OR 1.10 per mm, 95% CI 0.97–1.25, p = 0.15) among patients without previous AF, whereas sex, age, common risk factors, or cardiomyopathy were not significant predictors. Two embolic strokes occurred OAC-discontinued group; neither patients had documented AF prior or after the event, though one had a CHA2DS2-VA score of 3. No independent predictors of stroke were identified in the overall cohort. Conclusions Discontinuation of OAC after CTI ablation was performed in patients with low embolic risk and no prior AF, which was not associated with higher rates of events. LA enlargement might be a potential marker for new-onset AF during follow-up. These findings suggest that OAC discontinuation after successful CTI ablation may be safe in selected low-risk patients, whereas continued OAC should be considered in those with high CHA2DS2-VA scores or LA dilatation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruiz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: