Preoperative anatomical measurements on CT/MRI predicted sensing amplitudes, with RA-LSB distance during expiration differing between higher and lower P-wave amplitudes (46 vs 23 mm, P=0.01).
Cohort
Do anatomical measurements on preoperative CT or MRI predict P- and R-wave sensing amplitudes in patients undergoing EV-ICD implantation?
Preoperative CT or MRI measurements of the distances from the right atrium and right ventricle to the left sternal border may predict sensing amplitudes and help determine eligibility for extravascular ICD implantation.
Absolute Event Rate: 46% vs 23%
p-value: p=0.01
Abstract Introduction The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) provides defibrillation and antitachycardia pacing while avoiding complications associated with transvenous systems. However, anatomical predictors for successful implantation remain unclear. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent implantation of the Aurora EV-ICD (Medtronic) between March and September 2025. All patients underwent pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with some imaged during both inspiration and expiration. At the level of the inferior border of the aortic valve, the shortest distances from the right atrium and right ventricle to the left sternal border were measured (Figure 1A and B). The latest P- and R-wave amplitudes in the Ring 1–2 sensing vector obtained during follow-up were analyzed. P-wave amplitude was manually measured on stored electrograms (Figure 2). Results For P-wave stratification at 0.2 mV, patients with higher amplitudes had a shorter right atrium–to–left sternal border (RA–LSB) distance during expiration than those with lower amplitudes (46 ± 16 mm vs 23 ± 7 mm, P = 0.01). The RA–LSB distance also tended to be longer in expiration than in inspiration (43 ± 15 mm vs 39 ± 17 mm, P = 0.06; Figure 3A and B). For R-wave stratification at 1.0 mV, patients with lower amplitudes had a longer right ventricle–to–LSB (RV–LSB) distance during inspiration (22 ± 1 mm vs 12 ± 6 mm, P = 0.04), and the RV–LSB distance did not differ by respiratory phase overall (13 ± 7 mm vs 14 ± 6 mm, P = 0.56). Conclusion Anatomical measurements on preoperative CT may predict P- and R-wave amplitudes and help determine eligibility for EV-ICD implantation. In addition, analyzing preoperative CT images obtained during expiration may be particularly relevant for predicting P-wave amplitudes.
Nishikawa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV-ICD) implantation. Preoperative CT or MRI anatomical measurements was evaluated on Right atrium-to-left sternal border (RA-LSB) distance during expiration (higher vs lower P-wave amplitudes) (p=0.01). Preoperative anatomical measurements on CT/MRI predicted sensing amplitudes, with RA-LSB distance during expiration differing between higher and lower P-wave amplitudes (46 vs 23 mm, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: