Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper is a first attempt to present a "decision tree" to assist in choosing a brain-computer interface device for patients who are nearly or completely "locked-in" (cognitively intact but unable to move or communicate.) The first step is to assess any remaining function. There are six inflexion points in the decision-making process. These depend on the functional status of the patient: 1) some residual movement; 2) no movement, but some residual electromyographic (EMG) activity; 3) fully locked-in with no EMG activity or movements but with conjugate eye movements; 4) same as 3 but with disconjugate eye movements; 5) same as 4 but with inadequate assistance from the available EEG-based systems; 6) same as 5 and accepting of an invasive system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennedy et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: