Background First-line osimertinib is standard for advanced EGFR -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but upfront combinations (FLAURA2, MARIPOSA) are reshaping this paradigm. Trial practice gaps and the optimal management of oligoprogressive disease (OPD) remain unclear. We evaluated real-world effectiveness, progression patterns, and the role of local ablative therapy (LAT) in a Western European cohort. Patients and methods Multicenter retrospective cohort from eastern Spain including patients with advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC treated with first-line osimertinib. Outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), real-world overall survival (rwOS) and access to second-line therapy. Prespecified analyses examined exon 19 deletion versus p.Leu858Arg, baseline central nervous system metastases, OPD treated with LAT while continuing osimertinib, re-biopsy at progression, and time toxicity. Results Among 268 patients, median age was 72 years, 27.6% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and 42.5% had brain metastases. Osimertinib achieved an ORR of 73.5%, rwPFS of 17.5 months, and rwOS of 28.1 months, but only 50.1% of patients who progressed initiated second-line therapy. Among 180 patients with documented progression, 51 (28.3%) had OPD and 82.4% received LAT. Exploratory analyses suggested clinically meaningful improvements in median PFS and median OS versus the overall cohort. Re-biopsy identified resistance mechanisms (e.g. MET amplification, small-cell transformation), and time toxicity measures were modest. Conclusions In routine practice, first-line osimertinib shows robust effectiveness but lower rwOS than expected and substantial post-progression attrition. These findings underscore the need for risk-adapted treatment strategies and support prospective evaluation of OPD management approaches, including integration of LAT alongside contemporary systemic options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: