Key result
Expanded genetic screening for minor and candidate genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy significantly increased the rate of inconclusive tests from 9.6% to 36.0% (p<0.001), primarily due to variants of unknown significance in the TTN gene.
Why the study?
Does expanded genetic screening with minor genes and CNVs improve diagnostic yield in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=387)
Yes
Does expanded genetic screening with minor genes and CNVs improve diagnostic yield in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 9.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Expanded genetic screening in HCM provides a small increase in diagnostic yield but drastically increases inconclusive results, particularly due to TTN variants, suggesting TTN should not be routinely analyzed for clinical purposes in HCM.
Supports targeted genetic testing in cardiomyopathy; leaves open optimal NGS panel design due to VUS burden.
INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent inherited heart disease. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the preferred genetic test, but the diagnostic value of screening for minor and candidate genes, and the role of copy number variants (CNVs) deserves further evaluation. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-seven consecutive unrelated patients with HCM were screened for genetic variants in the 5 most frequent genes (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3 and TPM1) using Sanger sequencing (N = 84) or NGS (N = 303). In the NGS cohort we analyzed 20 additional minor or candidate genes, and applied a proprietary bioinformatics algorithm for detecting CNVs. Additionally, the rate and classification of TTN variants in HCM were compared with 427 patients without structural heart disease. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in the main genes was 33.3%, without significant differences between the Sanger sequencing and NGS cohorts. The screening for 20 additional genes revealed LP variants in ACTC1, MYL2, MYL3, TNNC1, GLA and PRKAG2 in 12 patients. This approach resulted in more inconclusive tests (36.0% vs. 9.6%, p<0.001), mostly due to variants of unknown significance (VUS) in TTN. The detection rate of rare variants in TTN was not significantly different to that found in the group of patients without structural heart disease. In the NGS cohort, 4 patients (1.3%) had pathogenic CNVs: 2 deletions in MYBPC3 and 2 deletions involving the complete coding region of PLN. CONCLUSIONS: A small percentage of HCM cases without point mutations in the 5 main genes are explained by P/LP variants in minor or candidate genes and CNVs. Screening for variants in TTN in HCM patients drastically increases the number of inconclusive tests, and shows a rate of VUS that is similar to patients without structural heart disease, suggesting that this gene should not be analyzed for clinical purposes in HCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mademont‐Soler et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=387). Expanded genetic screening (25-gene panel including minor/candidate genes and CNVs) vs. Standard genetic screening (5 main sarcomere genes) was evaluated on Rate of inconclusive genetic tests (variants of unknown significance) (p=<0.001). Expanded genetic screening for minor and candidate genes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy significantly increased the rate of inconclusive tests from 9.6% to 36.0% (p<0.001), primarily due to variants of unknown significance in the TTN gene.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: