Why the study?
Pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes may cause electrical instability leading to SCA or SUD before structural manifestations of cardiomyopathy become evident.
Does exome sequencing for cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes identify pathogenic variants in unexplained SCA survivors and autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=1,079)
Does exome sequencing for cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes identify pathogenic variants in unexplained SCA survivors and autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases compared to healthy controls?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exome sequencing reveals that a significant proportion of unexplained sudden cardiac arrest and sudden unexplained death cases harbor pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes, supporting their inclusion in genetic testing panels.
Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and sudden unexplained death (SUD) are feared sequelae of many genetic heart diseases. In rare circumstances, pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes may result in electrical instability leading to SCA/SUD before any structural manifestations of underlying cardiomyopathy are evident. Methods: Collectively, 38 unexplained SCA survivors (21 males; mean age at SCA 26.4±13.1 years), 68 autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases (46 males; mean age at death 20.4±9.0 years) without disease-causative variants in the channelopathy genes, and 973 ostensibly healthy controls were included. Following exome sequencing, ultrarare (minor allele frequency ≤0.00005 in any ethnic group within Genome Aggregation Database [gnomAD, N=141 456 individuals]) nonsynonymous variants identified in 24 Clinical Genome Resource adjudicated definitive/strong evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes were analyzed. Eligible variants were adjudicated as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or variant of uncertain significance in accordance with current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Results: Overall, 7 out of 38 (18.4%) SCA survivors and 14 out of 68 (20.5%) autopsy-inconclusive, channelopathic-negative SUD cases had at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic or a variant of uncertain significance nonsynonymous variant within a strong evidence, cardiomyopathy-susceptibility gene. Following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criterion variant adjudication, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified in 3 out of 38 (7.9%; P =0.05) SCA survivors and 8 out of 68 (11.8%; P =0.0002) autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases compared to 20 out of 973 (2.1%) European controls. Interestingly, the yield of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was significantly greater in autopsy-inconclusive SUD cases with documented interstitial fibrosis (4/11, 36%) compared with only 4 out of 57 (7%, P <0.02) SUD cases without ventricular fibrosis. Conclusions: Our data further supports the inclusion of strong evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes on the genetic testing panels used to evaluate unexplained SCA survivors and autopsy-inconclusive/negative SUD decedents. However, to avoid diagnostic miscues, the careful interpretation of genetic test results in patients without overt phenotypes is vital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neves et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden unexplained death (n=1,079). Pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes vs. Ostensibly healthy controls was evaluated on Identification of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a cardiomyopathy-susceptibility gene (p=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: