OBJECTIVE: The research sought to establish validated search filters for retrieval of studies on patients' knowledge and values. SETTING: Two nonprofit organizations in the Netherlands were studied for guideline development. METHODS: An existing filter was adapted to three bibliographic interfaces. After defining the scope, a reference database was built for the development of the new filters. The performance of the new filters was validated in different disease categories. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, and accuracy were (%): 90.5/98/77/99.2/97 (MEDLINE-Ovid), 90.1/98.8/79.3/99.5/98.3 (PubMed), and 93.1/98.4/81.8/99.6/98.7 (Embase). CONCLUSIONS: The filters provide pragmatic tools for searching for patients' issues. Further optimization and validation is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wessels et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: