Compares efficacy and thermal impact of dusting and fragmentation techniques in vitro, highlighting safety considerations.
Aim: Due to the potential risks of thermal effects during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy, different techniques may vary in efficacy and safety. This study compares the stone fragmentation efficiency and temperature elevation associated with dusting and fragmentation techniques using the Ho:YAG laser in an experimental model.Material and Methods: Using an artificial renal calyx model, ten experimental tubes and phantom stones were prepared for each technique. Energy settings were 0.5 J–20 Hz for the dusting technique and 1 J–10 Hz for the fragmentation technique. Temperature was measured every minute for five minutes, and stone weights were assessed.Results: The fragmentation technique resulted in significantly greater stone mass reduction from the first minute onward (p < 0.001). Although the average temperature increase was higher in the dusting group, the intergroup difference was insignificant (p = 0.144). In both techniques, the thermal threshold of 43 °C was exceeded at the 2nd to 3rd minute.Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore the importance of choosing a technique for Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy. The fragmentation technique was more effective for stone disintegration, while the dusting technique posed a higher thermal risk. The Ho:YAG laser method directly impacts clinical success and patient safety, highlighting the need for further research and careful consideration in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şenoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: