Review analyzes ecological risk management in non-human perspectives, suggesting new collaborative responses.
In this review, I examine The Gambling Animal by Harrison and Ross (Citation2025), which argues that humanity achieved ecological dominance through a “risk-management ratchet”: irreversively ratcheting up collective risk-taking via biological and cultural niche construction, from agriculture to capitalism. I engage critically with the book's ambivalence about human agency, its implicit prediction of civilizational collapse, and its cautious technological optimism. Drawing on Bateson's ecological critique of game theory, I highlight that their naturalistic, non-anthropocentric perspective points toward an under-explored conclusion that extending moral consideration to non-human nature, and developing new multi-species imaginaries, may be viable responses to the current ecological emergency. I conclude by calling for collaborative contributions to ecological risk management from across disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michiru Nagatsu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: