Reports bond order correlations using NMR spectroscopies in diphosphonioalkylidene complexes, implying novel bonding insights.
Diphosphonioalkylidene ligands have been central to developing f-element M═CR 2 double bond chemistry, but their wide range of C carbene 13 C NMR isotropic chemical shift (δ iso ) values has rendered their nature open to qualitative debate. Here, we report the use of 13 C and 17 O NMR spectroscopies to quantify the chemical shift anisotropies (CSAs) of two diphosphonioalkylidene complexes─[U(BIPM TMS )(O)(Cl) 2 ] ( 1, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10047–10054; BIPM TMS = {C(PPh 2 NSiMe 3 ) 2 } 2– ) and [Y(BIPM TMS )(I)(THF) 2 ] ( 2; Organometallics 2009, 28, 6771–6776)─that exhibit disparate solution/solid-state C carbene 13 C δ iso values (386.2/401.9 and 61.0/54.9 ppm, respectively) and for 1 a highly deshielded solution oxo 17 O NMR δ iso (1333.6 ppm). CSA analysis reveals encoded chemical shift tensor (CST) signatures for the U═C and U≡O bonds of 1 due to strong σ ↔ π* and π ↔ σ* magnetic shielding (σ) couplings; the U═C bond exhibits 13 C δ 11 and span (Ω) values that are both ∼ 50 ppm larger than any alkylidene complex, and the U≡O 17 O δ iso is deshielded >200 ppm compared to uranyl 17 O NMR data. CSA analysis confirms dominant 5f-orbital bonding and is consistent with an inverse- trans -influence in the C═U≡O linkage of 1 . By contrast, the 13 C NMR data for 2 exhibit signatures of Y═C double bonding tensioned with C═P ylidene contributions. For the M═CR 2 bonds, we find that the 13 C δ iso (σ iso ), δ 11 (σ 11 ), Ω, and the paramagnetic contribution to the shielding (σ p ) CSTs correlate strongly to bond order for a range of transition metals, rare earths, and actinides. This work demonstrates that CSA analysis is a powerful method for probing actinide chemical bonding, and it brackets the spectroscopic and bonding variance of diamagnetic diphosphonioalkylidene complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: