PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 28, 2026npj Breast Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Prospective observational study of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: JBCRG-C08/ATTRIBUTE

TSTatsunori ShimoiNSNobuhiro ShibataMKMasahiro Kitada

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of atezolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
  • Prospective observational study involving 149 safety and 148 full analysis patients;
  • Primary outcome measured was incidence of investigator-assessed adverse events;
  • Included patients ineligible for prior studies like IMpassion130.
  • AEs occurred in 96.6% of the safety population; serious AEs in 16.8%; immune-related AEs in 30.9%;
  • irAE incidence was 45.5% in patients with a history of autoimmune disease;
  • Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.2–6.7).

Abstract

Abstract The JBCRG-C08/ATTRIBUTE (UMIN000041747) study assessed atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel’s safety and effectiveness in a metastatic triple-negative breast cancer population, including IMpassion130-ineligible patients. The primary outcome was incidence of investigator-assessed adverse events (AEs). Safety and full analysis populations included 149 and 148 patients, respectively; 4.0% of the full analysis population had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 and 7.4% had a history/comorbidity of autoimmune disease (AID) at baseline. AEs occurred in 96.6% of the safety analysis population; serious AEs (SAEs), in 16.8%; and immune-related AEs (irAEs), in 30.9%. irAE incidence was 45.5% in patients with a history/comorbidity of AID. Notable SAEs included pneumonitis (3.4%), diarrhoea, pyrexia, adrenal insufficiency and cardiac failure (1.3% each). Two cases of Grade 5 pneumonitis occurred. Regarding effectiveness, median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.2–6.7). This first analysis found no new safety concerns with atezolizumab combination therapy, although patients with AID require careful monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shimoi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a40ba8861bb0a67205c6660https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00997-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract PS5-03-26: A Prospective Observational Study of Atezolizumab plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: First Analysis of JBCRG-C08/ATTRIBUTE2026
  2. 2Abstract PO3-17-12: Safety and efficacy of Atezolizumab in combination with nab-Paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1 positive metastatic or locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A pan-UK cancer centre experience2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer2018 · 4,444 citations
  4. 4Abstract PS16-02: Efficacy and safety of first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: the ATRACTIB phase 2 trial2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5180O IMpassion132 double-blind randomised phase III trial of chemotherapy (CT) ± atezolizumab (atezo) for early-relapsing unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC)2024 · 3 citations