Abstract Richard Musgrave et al.’s “Distribution of Tax Payments by Income Groups” (1951) provided the first postwar estimates of the distribution of the fiscal burden, concluding the tax system was not as progressive as statutory rates suggested. Drawing from original archival material, we reconstruct the intellectual context of Musgrave’s study, the methodological debates it gave rise to, and assess its legacy in public finance. The study’s legacy is examined through the rise of econometric estimation, applied general equilibrium modeling, and microdata-based approaches, as well as its influence on policy institutions in the USA and abroad. Despite major advances in data and modeling, we argue that key issues raised by Musgrave—particularly the definition of the income basis and the incidence of the corporate income tax—remain unresolved. The enduring lack of consensus on a uniquely best method highlights both the empirical and normative challenges at the heart of distributional analysis and explains the study’s continued relevance in contemporary debates on taxation and income inequality.
Desmarais-Tremblay et al. (Fri,) studied this question.