Contemporary debates in the cognitive science of religion often portray religiosity as cognitively weak, manipulable, and opposed to critical thinking. This article challenges such reductionist interpretations by proposing a Thomistic framework for understanding religion as a source of cognitive trust and epistemic resilience. Drawing on the epistemology of Thomas Aquinas, we argue that faith is a rational act of the intellect—not blind assent but thinking with assent. Using a qualitative, normative-analytical approach, we examine religion’s ambivalent role in contexts of misinformation, disinformation, and digital manipulation (e.g., deepfakes). While religious communities can be vulnerable to ideological distortion, the Thomistic account of intellectual and moral virtues offers conceptual tools for discernment. Faith, understood analogically and open to doubt, fosters epistemic humility and mental flexibility rather than dogmatic closure. We argue that authentic religious practice can enhance cognitive safety by integrating moral formation, communal verification of truth claims, and virtue-based discernment. In this perspective, religion does not undermine critical thinking but may strengthen resistance to epistemic pollution in the digital age, provided it remains rooted in intellectual virtue rather than ideological rigidity.
Roszak et al. (Fri,) studied this question.