PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 31, 2018Environmental Science & Technology200 citations

CuO Nanoparticle Dissolution and Toxicity to Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Rhizosphere Soil

View Full Paper
XGXiaoyu GaoAAAstrid AvellanSLStephanie Laughton

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It has been suggested, but not previously measured, that dissolution kinetics of soluble nanoparticles such as CuO nanoparticles (NPs) in soil affect their phytotoxicity. An added complexity is that such dissolution is also affected by the presence of plant roots. Here, we measured the rate of dissolution of CuO NPs in bulk soil, and in soil in which wheat plants ( Triticum aestivum) were grown under two soil NP dosing conditions: (a) freshly added CuO NPs (500 mg Cu/kg soil) and (b) CuO NPs aged for 28 d before planting. At the end of the plant growth period (14 d), available Cu was measured in three different soil compartments: bulk (not associated with roots), loosely attached to roots, and rhizosphere (soil firmly attached to roots). The labile Cu fraction increased from 17 mg/kg to 223 mg/kg in fresh treatments and from 283 mg/kg to 305 mg/kg in aged treatments over the growth period due to dissolution. Aging CuO NPs increased the toxicity to Triticum aestivum (reduction in root maximal length). The presence of roots in the soil had opposite and somewhat compensatory effects on NP dissolution, as measured in rhizosphere soil. pH increased 0.4 pH units for fresh NP treatments and 0.6 pH units for aged NPs. This lowered CuO NP dissolution in rhizosphere soil. Exudates from T. aestivum roots also increased soluble Cu in pore water. CaCl 2 extractable Cu concentrations increaed in rhizosphere soil compared to bulk soil, from 1.8 mg/kg to 6.2 mg/kg in fresh treatment and from 3.4 mg/kg to 5.4 mg/kg in aged treatments. Our study correlated CuO NP dissolution and the resulting Cu ion exposure profile to phytotoxicity, and showed that plant-induced changes in rhizosphere conditions should be considered when measuring the dissolution of CuO NPs near roots.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gao et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a41091cb7b89a99a2fe0658https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05816
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Time and Nanoparticle Concentration Affect the Extractability of Cu from CuO NP-Amended Soil2017 · 98 citations
  2. 2Distinctive effects of TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles on soil microbes and their community structures in flooded paddy soil2015 · 241 citations
  3. 3Fate and Bioavailability of Engineered Nanoparticles in Soils: A Review2014 · 449 citations
  4. 4Heavy-metal adaptation in terrestrial invertebrates: A review of occurrence, genetics, physiology and ecological consequences1993 · 307 citations
  5. 5Differences in Soil Solution Chemistry between Soils Amended with Nanosized CuO or Cu Reference Materials: Implications for Nanotoxicity Tests2014 · 41 citations